What is the difference between moderation and mediation

These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website.

These cookies do not store any personal information. Non-necessary Non-necessary. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Mediation A mediation analysis is an extension of multiple regression. The bivariate regression or Pearson correlation between X and Y is the total effect. The total effect is the relationship between X and Y when a mediator is not present.

In a mediation analysis, we want to obtain the zero-order or bivariate correlations between X and M, and between M and Y. Next, a multiple regression is used to get the direct and indirect effects where X and M are independent variables and Y as the dependent variable. Using hierarchical multiple regression analysis, we enter the two independent variables X and W in Step 1, the interaction term in Step 2, and Y as the dependent variable.

You may also like:. Classical and Cooperative Suppression — Simplified. Previous Previous post: Is it too late to build cognitive reserve? So, if the independent variable is personality similarity, the moderator is age difference and the dependent variable is marital satisfaction, and they are all continuous variables…. The marital satisfaction is regressed on predictor, moderator, and the predictor X moderator term.

Moderator effects are indicated by the significant effect of the third term personality similarity X age difference while the other two terms are controlled for in the regression analysis. Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage. Chapter 7: Moderator and mediator analysis. Mediators explain how external physical events take on internal psychological significance.

Whereas moderator variables specify when certain effects will hold, mediators speak to how or why such effects occur. Moderator variables always function as independent variables, whereas mediating events are viewed either as effects or as causes, depending on the stage of the mediational analysis. That is, whereas a moderator and predictor are at the same level in regard to their role as causal variables antecedent to a criterion effect, a predictor is causally antecedent to the mediator.

This is the latest and best book currently in my opinion: Andrew Hayes This is a concise explanation I found very useful for preparing this course: Miles, J. David Garson If mediator error is likely to be high, researchers should collect multiple indicators of the construct and use SEM to estimate latent variables. The safest ways to make sure your mediator is not caused by your DV are to experimentally manipulate the variable or collect the measurement of your mediator before you introduce your IV.

The above shows the standard mediation model. Perfect mediation occurs when the effect of X on Y decreases to 0 with M in the model. Partial mediation occurs when the effect of X on Y decreases by a nontrivial amount the actual amount is up for debate with M in the model. Note that we are intentionally creating a mediation effect here because statistics is always more fun if we have something to find and we do so below by creating M so that it is related to X and Y so that it is related to M.

This creates the causal chain for our analysis to parse. This is the original 4-step method used to describe a mediation effect. Steps 1 and 2 use basic linear regression while steps 3 and 4 use multiple regression.

For help with regression, see Chapter The Steps: 1. Estimate the relationship between Y on X controlling for M wakefulness on hours since dawn, controlling for coffee consumption -Should be non-significant and nearly 0. Here we find that our total effect model shows a significant positive relationship between hours since dawn X and wakefulness Y. Our Path A model shows that hours since down X is also positively related to coffee consumption M. Our Path B model then shows that coffee consumption M positively predicts wakefulness Y when controlling for hours since dawn X.

Finally, wakefulness Y does not predict hours since dawn X when controlling for coffee consumption M. Since the relationship between hours since dawn and wakefulness is no longer significant when controlling for coffee consumption, this suggests that coffee consumption does in fact mediate this relationship.

The Sobel Test uses a specialized t-test to determine if there is a significant reduction in the effect of X on Y when M is present. You can either use this value to calculate your p-value or run the mediation. However, the Sobel Test is largely considered an outdated method since it assumes that the indirect effect ab is normally distributed and tends to only have adequate power with large sample sizes.

Thus, again, it is highly recommended to use the mediation bootstrapping method instead. To run the mediate function, we will again need a model of our IV hours since dawn , predicting our mediator coffee consumption like our Path A model above.

We will also need a model of the direct effect of our IV hours since dawn on our DV wakefulness , when controlling for our mediator coffee consumption.